Blog Layout


The mental toll from 2020 – and what this means for 2021

The physical ravages and unfortunate deaths caused by COVID-19 are well documented, but this pandemic has also taken a toll in many other ways. 


There are the obvious financial impacts – from business closures; inevitable redundancies; through to billions of dollars of government funded wage subsidies – as we all try to navigate our way through some serious economic turbulence.  Then there’s the ongoing uncertainty of living in the shadow of COVID-19…  Should we book that event?  Should we plan a holiday?  When will we see loved ones overseas again?  And with Auckland bouncing in and out of lockdown (and back in again) just recently, uncertainty has ratcheted up another notch. 


One of the lingering impacts from 2020 therefore, has been on the mental health of New Zealanders.

 


It was a tough year for many of us


The Ministry Health estimates that 660,000 New Zealanders suffer some form of depression – up 32% compared with 2012.  With the stigma around mental health slowly receding and more focus on the subject, we need to understand the wider mental health context resulting from COVID-19, even where the physical (i.e. health) impact may have been limited.  And it could be argued that the long-term impact to our minds is arguably an even bigger public health challenge.


As an indicator, a Dynata survey taken at the end of 2020 certainly alludes to a mental health impact, with four in ten (43%) saying they were more stressed than the previous year.  An identical number (43%) also said they were more anxious than in 2019 before COVID-19 appeared.   In amongst the plethora of negative news related to health and the economy – from NZ and overseas – this certainly doesn’t seem surprising.  But when does temporary mental state become an ingrained trait for those who have suffered the worst effects from COVID-19? 


One of our 2020 Vision participants noted “I don’t watch the news anymore – its so depressing. All you hear about is how many people are dying of this virus.  You wonder when it will all end”. 


The unique experience of lockdowns and the various travel restrictions were certainly felt, adding to our mental health load.  The Dynata survey highlighted that three in ten (29%) were more lonely in 2020 compared to the previous year, while four in ten (40%) considered their personal relationships stronger than the year prior.  So, while our household bubbles helped bond many spouses and families over board games and long walks, others were disconnected from their loved ones – particularly the elderly. 

 

With a vaccine having now arrived in New Zealand, hope is certainly on the horizon, but we still have a long way to go before COVID-19 is fully under control.  Large-scale vaccination of the general population is unlikely to be completed before the end of this year, nor is our international border expected to be freely open before 2022.  What if this ‘COVID-19 environment’ lingers for longer, or the economic recovery (especially in the hardest hit sectors) isn’t as quick as desired?  The Christchurch earthquake experience has shown that the effects of psychological distress often don’t manifest until much later after the actual event.  The mental scars of COVID-19 may well endure for some time.


Of course, not all people’s mental health has been adversely affected to the same degree, but all of us will be feeling the effects in some way.

 


How do brands need to respond in 2021? 


That’s a big question off the back of a year in which many organisations were called out for how they responded – or didn’t respond – to support the ‘team of 5 million’. But the Dynata survey provides some clues on what these organisations need to be thinking of in 2021. 


For starters, those expressing greater levels of stress or anxiety in 2020 indicated they were looking for brands that demonstrate they care and who are transparent – essentially showing a sense of fairness in how they interact with their customers.  It seems like customer experience design teams have the perfect opportunity to make a case to really enhance the customer journey – eliminating any pain-points that just add to stress levels, while showing a humane side even if delivered via channels that aren’t classically ‘human’. 


At a time when communications budgets are coming under increasing scrutiny, it also feels the right time to invest wisely in building even deeper emotive connections with consumers.  Stories of human bonding and relationships have always been rich emotional material, but this has been heightened through this pandemic as our household bubbles have brought us closer together in many cases.


Trustpower has managed to tap into this with their most recent campaign 'Lost & Found', in which two people re-connect later in life. This story of human connection has performed well above industry norms in a number of advertising diagnostics, and achieved the highest recall of any Trustpower campaign over the past seven years. By reflecting what’s important to us as a society at the moment, Trustpower have succeeded in creating an emotional connection with their audience.


 

*Survey data was collected by Dynata in December 2020 and interviewed a nationally representative sample of 1000 New Zealanders.


Note, this article was first published as part of the 2020 Vision Project - a research project conducted by Cole Armstrong at NeuroSpot (cole@neurospot.co.nz) and Mark Finnegan at Clarity Insight (mark@clarityinsight.co.nz), looking into the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic was having on our community.

By Cole Armstrong September 4, 2024
In recent discussions about customer behaviour, a recurring theme has emerged: the belief that providing more information will lead to better decision-making (“If only they knew … then they would …”). While this perspective isn't entirely misplaced, it overlooks a crucial nuance. It's not merely what people know that drives their behaviour, but rather what information is most salient and readily springs to mind in the moment of decision. The Limitation of Knowledge Alone It's easy to assume that if customers simply knew more, they would make better decisions. For instance, knowing how to budget effectively or save money can indeed be useful. Knowing that I should save more for retirement or for investments. That I should eat less red meat for health or sustainability reasons. That I should be careful about what information I share online. These are all real-life examples of issues I’ve worked on where educating customers (or users) might have been a solution – and where helping people ‘know’ why they should do it failed to shift the needle. The critical factor isn't just having the information, but rather how accessible and prominent that information is when it’s needed. The question then is not do I know something, but rather does it spring to mind when it can actually shape my decisions? The Salience of Information in Decision-Making Consider a scenario where a customer interacts with a product or service. The decision-making process is often instantaneous and intuitive, driven by what immediately comes to mind rather than a comprehensive evaluation of all known benefits. This means that the information most salient at the moment—whether it's the immediate cost or a specific feature—has a more significant impact than the general knowledge a customer might have. As an example, I was involved in a project where my client was responding to new environmental regulations – and wanted to find out how to do this without upsetting their customers. The initial solution didn’t work because what was salient – and thus impacted customers responses – was the benefit to the brand not the benefit to the environment. While both benefits were ‘known’ by customers, it wasn’t till small tweaks were made to subtly emphasise and customer support for such actions, that complaints dropped off. A Case in Point: Council Rates Another example where this idea is relevant are the rates (tax) bills that New Zealanders receive from their local council. While residents might be well aware of the benefits their rates support—such as parks, libraries, and community services—this knowledge doesn’t always translate into a positive reaction when the bill arrives. For many, the first thing that springs to mind is the expense, not the benefits. In my case, receiving a $1,000 council rates bill (these are billed quarterly) was a stark reminder of this phenomenon. Despite understanding the value provided by these rates, the immediate focus was on the financial burden. If the benefits were more salient at the time of billing, the experience could be more positive. For instance, if the rates bill included a summary of the value received from various services—like a breakdown showing the value I obtain from the library based on the number of books borrowed—this could shift the focus from the cost to the benefits. In my case, borrowing 35 books over three months at an estimated value of $30 each amount to $1,050 worth of benefits, which highlights the value received far beyond the cost. And of course there are other services that I use as well – my local park that I go running in, the playgrounds that I take my kids to, the roads I drive along or the public transport that is subsidised. I ‘know’ these things, but do they immediately spring to mind when I see my rates bill? Seizing the Opportunity This concept of salience extends beyond council rates. In various customer interactions—such as bills, invoices, loyalty schemes, and product renewals—the opportunity lies in enhancing the salience of positive attributes at the critical moment of engagement. To effectively leverage this understanding, organisations should focus on making the benefits of their products or services more prominent when customers are most engaged and in a way that is relevant to the context. This means designing communications and touchpoints that highlight the value received, not just the cost or features.  While knowledge is important, it's the salience of that knowledge at the moment of decision that truly influences behaviour. By ensuring that the most relevant and positive information is top-of-mind, organisations can improve customer satisfaction and decision-making outcomes.
By Cole Armstrong July 24, 2024
Navigating the Shifting Landscape of Design
By Cole Armstrong March 15, 2024
How do we create persuasive touchpoints that make a difference? By considering how simple ways of reframing our messages, using insights from psychology and behavioural science, can create greater motivation to act.
Show More
Share by: