Blog Layout


Why we’re not scanning in with the COVID tracker app (or why we don’t do what we intend to)

An ongoing challenge in New Zealand’s battle with COVID-19 has been people’s compliance with seemingly simple behaviours such as mask wearing in public spaces during lockdown, and use of the COVID tracer app. While these simple behaviours can reduce the spread of future outbreaks, and the likelihood of future lockdowns, clearly there is a barrier stopping people.


Ultimately these barriers are psychological in nature, reflecting well-documented decision-making biases. And this means we need to look to understand the drivers of these behaviours, to develop effective solutions.

 

It’s not a challenge of intention … it’s a challenge of behaviour


Research from The 2020 Vision Project has pointed to people’s willingness to do ‘the right thing’. When talking to some of our participants we found people were generally supportive of steps such as wearing masks in public spaces such as public transport and supermarkets, and scanning in with the COIVD tracer app. One person said: “I really don’t mind wearing them … it’s not that hard to wear a mask for 20 minutes while you run into the supermarket”.


This matches recent survey results from Dynata (collected December 2020), showing that people understood the gravity of the situation, finding that 79% believed that NZ needed to avoid taking unnecessary risks in relation to COVID-19. Data collected by Dynata in August 2020, shows a similar story, with more than 60% supporting the idea of wearing masks in public spaces such as supermarkets during Level 2.


But clearly that’s not the full story. After each community outbreak, we see spikes in COVID app usage – which drops again soon after. This is despite frequent requests from the likes of Ashley Bloomfield to continue using the app when out in public to control future outbreaks: "We all have a responsibility to support contact tracing by keeping a record of our movements, either with the app or by another method such as a diary”.


Figure 1: Number of daily scans and diary entries using the NZ COVID Trace app. Source: NZ Ministry of Health


Is it that people can’t be bothered? Or is there something more?


In our conversations with people, it became clear that the intention was there – people knew how they should behave and wanted to do it. But as time wears on, day-to-day issues become more urgent and salient in people’s minds. This results in decreased motivation to follow through with the behaviour, at the time the behaviour needs to be enacted.


As one person said: “I feel bad about [not scanning in] and I should do it … the other day I was looking at something on my phone and I walked straight past [the QR code]

 

Why does this happen?


This challenge – getting people to follow through with how they know they should behave – is something very common. This affects everything from our attitudes towards sustainability (do we use the single-use plastic bag in the produce department even though we know it carries a long-term cost?), and our willingness to save for retirement, amongst other things.


It can come down to several reasons – and all might be acting to influence people’s behaviour. An effective behaviour change strategy requires robust insights into what these reasons might be.



For example, in the case of using the COVID tracer app, we know that small inconveniences (or friction) can have a large impact on what people do. This is why Amazon’s one-click ordering has proven so successful – they’ve taken away one point of friction to people doing what they wanted to do.


Another factor could be the reduced risk saliency in people’s minds – over time, information is downgraded in people’s minds until a new incident increases its space in our consciousness. As an example, whenever a well-documented plane crash occurs, anxiety about flying increases – despite the car ride to the airport being more dangerous.

 

Finally, we could also be seeing something called temporal discounting, in which costs incurred today, even trivial costs such as opening an app, are seen to outweigh the benefits incurred in the future. In one famous case study, Bank of America was able to reverse this impact, by allowing retirement fund customers to upload a picture of themselves and see how they would look in the future – making our future self (and the benefits it will experience) more readily apparent to our current self).

 

What do we do now?


Many of the challenge’s organisations are facing, whether from COVID-19 or more everyday customer challenges, are psychological in nature. Understanding what is impacting your customer’s decision – even when it doesn’t make sense at first glance – is the first step to developing an effective strategy.


If you’d like to find out more about how to understand the psychological drivers impacting your organisation’s users, feel free to get in touch with Cole Armstrong at NeuroSpot (cole@neurospot.co.nz) or Mark Finnegan at Clarity Insight (mark@clarityinsight.co.nz).


By Cole Armstrong September 4, 2024
In recent discussions about customer behaviour, a recurring theme has emerged: the belief that providing more information will lead to better decision-making (“If only they knew … then they would …”). While this perspective isn't entirely misplaced, it overlooks a crucial nuance. It's not merely what people know that drives their behaviour, but rather what information is most salient and readily springs to mind in the moment of decision. The Limitation of Knowledge Alone It's easy to assume that if customers simply knew more, they would make better decisions. For instance, knowing how to budget effectively or save money can indeed be useful. Knowing that I should save more for retirement or for investments. That I should eat less red meat for health or sustainability reasons. That I should be careful about what information I share online. These are all real-life examples of issues I’ve worked on where educating customers (or users) might have been a solution – and where helping people ‘know’ why they should do it failed to shift the needle. The critical factor isn't just having the information, but rather how accessible and prominent that information is when it’s needed. The question then is not do I know something, but rather does it spring to mind when it can actually shape my decisions? The Salience of Information in Decision-Making Consider a scenario where a customer interacts with a product or service. The decision-making process is often instantaneous and intuitive, driven by what immediately comes to mind rather than a comprehensive evaluation of all known benefits. This means that the information most salient at the moment—whether it's the immediate cost or a specific feature—has a more significant impact than the general knowledge a customer might have. As an example, I was involved in a project where my client was responding to new environmental regulations – and wanted to find out how to do this without upsetting their customers. The initial solution didn’t work because what was salient – and thus impacted customers responses – was the benefit to the brand not the benefit to the environment. While both benefits were ‘known’ by customers, it wasn’t till small tweaks were made to subtly emphasise and customer support for such actions, that complaints dropped off. A Case in Point: Council Rates Another example where this idea is relevant are the rates (tax) bills that New Zealanders receive from their local council. While residents might be well aware of the benefits their rates support—such as parks, libraries, and community services—this knowledge doesn’t always translate into a positive reaction when the bill arrives. For many, the first thing that springs to mind is the expense, not the benefits. In my case, receiving a $1,000 council rates bill (these are billed quarterly) was a stark reminder of this phenomenon. Despite understanding the value provided by these rates, the immediate focus was on the financial burden. If the benefits were more salient at the time of billing, the experience could be more positive. For instance, if the rates bill included a summary of the value received from various services—like a breakdown showing the value I obtain from the library based on the number of books borrowed—this could shift the focus from the cost to the benefits. In my case, borrowing 35 books over three months at an estimated value of $30 each amount to $1,050 worth of benefits, which highlights the value received far beyond the cost. And of course there are other services that I use as well – my local park that I go running in, the playgrounds that I take my kids to, the roads I drive along or the public transport that is subsidised. I ‘know’ these things, but do they immediately spring to mind when I see my rates bill? Seizing the Opportunity This concept of salience extends beyond council rates. In various customer interactions—such as bills, invoices, loyalty schemes, and product renewals—the opportunity lies in enhancing the salience of positive attributes at the critical moment of engagement. To effectively leverage this understanding, organisations should focus on making the benefits of their products or services more prominent when customers are most engaged and in a way that is relevant to the context. This means designing communications and touchpoints that highlight the value received, not just the cost or features.  While knowledge is important, it's the salience of that knowledge at the moment of decision that truly influences behaviour. By ensuring that the most relevant and positive information is top-of-mind, organisations can improve customer satisfaction and decision-making outcomes.
By Cole Armstrong July 24, 2024
Navigating the Shifting Landscape of Design
By Cole Armstrong March 15, 2024
How do we create persuasive touchpoints that make a difference? By considering how simple ways of reframing our messages, using insights from psychology and behavioural science, can create greater motivation to act.
Show More
Share by: