Blog Layout


How can behavioural science contribute to better design decisions?

What the world needs isn’t new ideas; it’s new ideas that work. Our challenge is often to get to those ideas that work quickly, with an efficient use of time and money, and to demonstrate that these ideas have made an impact (i.e. separating the ideas that work, from the ideas that sounded promising).

We also need to be aware that when we are designing for behaviour change, we are designing not for how people experience the world, but how people perceive their experience of the world. Perception trumps reality[1].

This is where there is an opportunity for designers to bring a different lens and set of tools into their design tool chest, calling upon the fields of psychology, cognitive science and behavioural economics to inform all stages of their design process. This idea isn’t new, with behavioural design increasingly used in government (for example the infamous Behavioural Insights Team which operates around the world including NZ), and in corporate settings (e.g. Walmart, Google, The Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Spotify).

However, the challenge I see isn’t people’s willingness to utilise behavioural science (there’s widespread interest in the field of behavioural economics, for example[2]). The challenge and opportunity is to see how behavioural science can be more rigorously used throughout the design process, in the process, de-risking key design decisions.

Over the next 12 months as part of the CX Collective Associates programme, I’ll be exploring how we can better integrate behavioural science into the design conversation.



Behavioural science: A different lens to the same problem

So why behavioural  science? My view is that a behavioural lens holds value at all stages of a design conversation, from problem definition to validation of ideas.


The benefits can be seen in a well-known case study, of an airport in Houston that looked at how they could decrease customer complaints, caused by the wait times at the luggage carousel. While a rational response would be to look at shortening how long it takes to get the luggage off the plane, you could imagine this would also prove costly.


Their approach was to do something quite different – to make people walk further from their plane to the luggage carousel, so their bags were waiting for them when they arrived. Why? The designers understood how human perception of time plays into an experience, and how this could be influenced by changing the environment. I’ve found similar insights – leading to a different set of solutions – in online and physical environments.


This example, illustrates several benefits of taking a behavioural science lens to developing new solutions, not least finding a relatively cheap and non-obvious solution that benefits the organisation and its users.




Moving beyond the academic to the practical


Behavioural science, or Behavioural Economics, has been having a large impact on the thinking of a number of customer/ user facing strategies. For example, it’s recently been discussed in terms of how to increase uptake of a COVID-19 vaccine, Heineken’s campaign to reduce drink driving, and how to increase Kiwisaver savings rates. Behind the scenes, it’s also informed the strategies of many NZ commercial organisations – hidden away behind the guise of competitive advantage.


But here’s the opportunity. I see plenty of design solutions that could have been improved by a basic understanding of psychology; projects that are unduly influenced by what a customer says; solutions that are signed and delivered without an understanding of the actual impact on the user. And because they’re overlooked, they’re often easy pickings – ways to differentiate from your competitor, or from previous solutions proposed.


But should it be hidden away like this? Shouldn’t something as important as the study of human behaviour (i.e. psychology) and decision-making (i.e. behavioural economics) be made accessible to a wider audience? This is a big opportunity, to make the study of human decision making accessible and part of the daily conversation for NZ designers.




Over the coming 12 months, Cole Armstrong from behavioural insights agency NeuroSpot will be taking part in the CX Collective’s Associate’s programme. During this period, he will be looking at how some of the key frameworks from the world of behavioural science can be made accessible to designers – adding value to their existing approaches.



Notes:

[1] Ironically, the best example of perception trumping reality, comes from the current US President.


[2] One of the challenges that behavioural economics has as an applied field, is a perception that it can be used as a series of one-off tactical approaches or gimmicks.

By Cole Armstrong September 4, 2024
In recent discussions about customer behaviour, a recurring theme has emerged: the belief that providing more information will lead to better decision-making (“If only they knew … then they would …”). While this perspective isn't entirely misplaced, it overlooks a crucial nuance. It's not merely what people know that drives their behaviour, but rather what information is most salient and readily springs to mind in the moment of decision. The Limitation of Knowledge Alone It's easy to assume that if customers simply knew more, they would make better decisions. For instance, knowing how to budget effectively or save money can indeed be useful. Knowing that I should save more for retirement or for investments. That I should eat less red meat for health or sustainability reasons. That I should be careful about what information I share online. These are all real-life examples of issues I’ve worked on where educating customers (or users) might have been a solution – and where helping people ‘know’ why they should do it failed to shift the needle. The critical factor isn't just having the information, but rather how accessible and prominent that information is when it’s needed. The question then is not do I know something, but rather does it spring to mind when it can actually shape my decisions? The Salience of Information in Decision-Making Consider a scenario where a customer interacts with a product or service. The decision-making process is often instantaneous and intuitive, driven by what immediately comes to mind rather than a comprehensive evaluation of all known benefits. This means that the information most salient at the moment—whether it's the immediate cost or a specific feature—has a more significant impact than the general knowledge a customer might have. As an example, I was involved in a project where my client was responding to new environmental regulations – and wanted to find out how to do this without upsetting their customers. The initial solution didn’t work because what was salient – and thus impacted customers responses – was the benefit to the brand not the benefit to the environment. While both benefits were ‘known’ by customers, it wasn’t till small tweaks were made to subtly emphasise and customer support for such actions, that complaints dropped off. A Case in Point: Council Rates Another example where this idea is relevant are the rates (tax) bills that New Zealanders receive from their local council. While residents might be well aware of the benefits their rates support—such as parks, libraries, and community services—this knowledge doesn’t always translate into a positive reaction when the bill arrives. For many, the first thing that springs to mind is the expense, not the benefits. In my case, receiving a $1,000 council rates bill (these are billed quarterly) was a stark reminder of this phenomenon. Despite understanding the value provided by these rates, the immediate focus was on the financial burden. If the benefits were more salient at the time of billing, the experience could be more positive. For instance, if the rates bill included a summary of the value received from various services—like a breakdown showing the value I obtain from the library based on the number of books borrowed—this could shift the focus from the cost to the benefits. In my case, borrowing 35 books over three months at an estimated value of $30 each amount to $1,050 worth of benefits, which highlights the value received far beyond the cost. And of course there are other services that I use as well – my local park that I go running in, the playgrounds that I take my kids to, the roads I drive along or the public transport that is subsidised. I ‘know’ these things, but do they immediately spring to mind when I see my rates bill? Seizing the Opportunity This concept of salience extends beyond council rates. In various customer interactions—such as bills, invoices, loyalty schemes, and product renewals—the opportunity lies in enhancing the salience of positive attributes at the critical moment of engagement. To effectively leverage this understanding, organisations should focus on making the benefits of their products or services more prominent when customers are most engaged and in a way that is relevant to the context. This means designing communications and touchpoints that highlight the value received, not just the cost or features.  While knowledge is important, it's the salience of that knowledge at the moment of decision that truly influences behaviour. By ensuring that the most relevant and positive information is top-of-mind, organisations can improve customer satisfaction and decision-making outcomes.
By Cole Armstrong July 24, 2024
Navigating the Shifting Landscape of Design
By Cole Armstrong March 15, 2024
How do we create persuasive touchpoints that make a difference? By considering how simple ways of reframing our messages, using insights from psychology and behavioural science, can create greater motivation to act.
Show More
Share by: