Blog Layout


Why Santa needs some Choice Architecture

Over the weekend I went to the local shopping centre with my wife and 10-month old child for our first family photo with Santa. We were lucky – our daughter had slept well, and is pretty good with new people, so there were no tears (maybe next year?).

But one thing became obvious – that no one had given serious thought to how a consumer would choose from the myriad of photo packages. The way the photo packages were presented to us caused so many issues: a poor customer experience, longer queue times as every family in front of us struggled to decide on which option to pay for, and likely lead to lower revenue for Santa and his helpers. And this could be an easy fix. So, what could they do to fix this? The answer is Choice Architecture.

Choice Architecture: Controlling the context to influence decision-making 

Choice Architecture came out of Thaler and Sunstein’s infamous book “Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness”. It refers to the practice of organising the context in a way that influences how people make decisions. This is a reflection that the decisions people make are heavily influenced by the context in which we make those decisions e.g. eating healthier food is influenced by where in a café the healthy food is located; our willingness to accept financial risk is influenced by the way the risk is framed. 

By understanding that context influences decisions, and how context influences decisions, “choice architects” can make deliberate choices about the context that influence real world behaviours. In practice, choice architecture happens all around us. By placing fruit and veg at the front of a supermarket and chocolate bars on the way out, someone has made a deliberate decision to influence what I buy. By placing bus stations at certain intervals, increasing the frequency of buses in my area, and developing an app to track where my bus is, someone is deliberately trying to influence my decision to catch a bus.

What makes Choice Architecture particularly powerful, is when “choice architects” utilise the latest findings from behavioural science – in a deliberate, rigorous way – to influence behaviour. Research has shown that people’s behaviour is more predictable than we many people realise; and that the influences on our behaviour can’t always be detected by asking people what affects their decisions, but by observing what people actually do and how they respond.

Salience: Making the desired option the most visually obvious


One of the simplest solutions is to make the most desirable choice stick out on the page. This can be done through use of imagery, borders, font size and colour, amongst other options. This stems from the fact that the brain is inherently lazy – with a preference for the option. Making the option more salient doesn’t just increase attention, it makes the option easier to process..


For example, Vodafone guides people towards a preferred mobile option, Unlimited, by changing the outline colour to make it more salient. NB: this also works because they’ve focused on one option, instead of highlighting multiple competing options..




Social proof


When making decisions, we are heavily influenced by the decisions of those around us. By utilising social proof we can indicate what a typical decision is and increase the likelihood that a customer will make a similar decision.


For example, in this situation Santa’s photographer could have indicated which option is their most popular option (assuming that’s the option they want to promote), or which is their most popular option amongst a certain type of customer. We were a family of three – what option would most families our size have chosen? We’ve got three sets of grandparents and a range of uncles and aunties we might want photos for – what do people in a similar family dynamic choose?


Decoy product


Another option that may have worked is through the use of decoy products – the inclusion of a similarly priced but inferior choice that makes you away from choosing a lower value option and makes the higher priced option seem like a better deal. This works because value is a subjective experience and is based in the context in which a decision is made. Change the context, and you can change someone’s perception of value.


Perhaps one of the 43 photo packages could have acted as a decoy product to a more expensive product offer?




Anchoring


How do we know something is good value? Obvious really – we evaluate what we get for what we pay against some other value that springs to mind. Anchoring works by deliberately being that anchor value that springs to mind – for example a $5 coffee sounds great given that I’m anchored to pay $5 for coffee in most cafes. A $7 coffee sounds like more dubious value – unless I’m sitting in an airport or at a café overseas where the coffee around me costs an average $7.


This effect has been famously documented by behavioural economist Dan Ariely, using the example of The Economist subscription. In this example, the inclusion of an inferior subscription offer – an offer that few people chose – would have resulted in an increase in revenue of 43%. The inferior subscription offer wasn’t intended to be chosen, but merely makes a more expensive subscription offer appear to be better value and hence more desirable.


In this case, they might’ve anchored me by pointing to the cost of a typical family photo sitting (say $200).



Summary


Some of these examples are more plausible than others. What would make the difference is taking control of the Choice Architecture – being very deliberate about what is presented and presenting in a way that works with how our minds actually make decisions. If employed correctly this can be a win for customers who get a better experience and feel better about their choices, and a win for the organisation who is bringing in greater revenue for existing resources.


By Cole Armstrong September 4, 2024
In recent discussions about customer behaviour, a recurring theme has emerged: the belief that providing more information will lead to better decision-making (“If only they knew … then they would …”). While this perspective isn't entirely misplaced, it overlooks a crucial nuance. It's not merely what people know that drives their behaviour, but rather what information is most salient and readily springs to mind in the moment of decision. The Limitation of Knowledge Alone It's easy to assume that if customers simply knew more, they would make better decisions. For instance, knowing how to budget effectively or save money can indeed be useful. Knowing that I should save more for retirement or for investments. That I should eat less red meat for health or sustainability reasons. That I should be careful about what information I share online. These are all real-life examples of issues I’ve worked on where educating customers (or users) might have been a solution – and where helping people ‘know’ why they should do it failed to shift the needle. The critical factor isn't just having the information, but rather how accessible and prominent that information is when it’s needed. The question then is not do I know something, but rather does it spring to mind when it can actually shape my decisions? The Salience of Information in Decision-Making Consider a scenario where a customer interacts with a product or service. The decision-making process is often instantaneous and intuitive, driven by what immediately comes to mind rather than a comprehensive evaluation of all known benefits. This means that the information most salient at the moment—whether it's the immediate cost or a specific feature—has a more significant impact than the general knowledge a customer might have. As an example, I was involved in a project where my client was responding to new environmental regulations – and wanted to find out how to do this without upsetting their customers. The initial solution didn’t work because what was salient – and thus impacted customers responses – was the benefit to the brand not the benefit to the environment. While both benefits were ‘known’ by customers, it wasn’t till small tweaks were made to subtly emphasise and customer support for such actions, that complaints dropped off. A Case in Point: Council Rates Another example where this idea is relevant are the rates (tax) bills that New Zealanders receive from their local council. While residents might be well aware of the benefits their rates support—such as parks, libraries, and community services—this knowledge doesn’t always translate into a positive reaction when the bill arrives. For many, the first thing that springs to mind is the expense, not the benefits. In my case, receiving a $1,000 council rates bill (these are billed quarterly) was a stark reminder of this phenomenon. Despite understanding the value provided by these rates, the immediate focus was on the financial burden. If the benefits were more salient at the time of billing, the experience could be more positive. For instance, if the rates bill included a summary of the value received from various services—like a breakdown showing the value I obtain from the library based on the number of books borrowed—this could shift the focus from the cost to the benefits. In my case, borrowing 35 books over three months at an estimated value of $30 each amount to $1,050 worth of benefits, which highlights the value received far beyond the cost. And of course there are other services that I use as well – my local park that I go running in, the playgrounds that I take my kids to, the roads I drive along or the public transport that is subsidised. I ‘know’ these things, but do they immediately spring to mind when I see my rates bill? Seizing the Opportunity This concept of salience extends beyond council rates. In various customer interactions—such as bills, invoices, loyalty schemes, and product renewals—the opportunity lies in enhancing the salience of positive attributes at the critical moment of engagement. To effectively leverage this understanding, organisations should focus on making the benefits of their products or services more prominent when customers are most engaged and in a way that is relevant to the context. This means designing communications and touchpoints that highlight the value received, not just the cost or features.  While knowledge is important, it's the salience of that knowledge at the moment of decision that truly influences behaviour. By ensuring that the most relevant and positive information is top-of-mind, organisations can improve customer satisfaction and decision-making outcomes.
By Cole Armstrong July 24, 2024
Navigating the Shifting Landscape of Design
By Cole Armstrong March 15, 2024
How do we create persuasive touchpoints that make a difference? By considering how simple ways of reframing our messages, using insights from psychology and behavioural science, can create greater motivation to act.
Show More
Share by: