Blog Layout


Vodafone Warriors: Measuring the home-team sponsorship advantage

Brand sponsorships can be risky business. You're taking a gamble on what is essentially an intangible relationship - will there be a return on your investment, and how do you even begin to measure it?


The Challenge

How do you show value in sponsorships for brands?


This was the question the Vodafone Warriors posed of NeuroSpot in mid-2019. In particular, they wanted to understand what it was like to be a game-day supporter at the home ground - Mt Smart Stadium, and what impact a home game could have for their sponsors.


The Vodafone Warriors are one of New Zealand's most exciting professional sporting teams and are backed by a loyal fan base that spans the country. They've also attracted an extensive list of long-term sponsorship deals with well-known brands such as Vodafone, Canterbury of New Zealand, Mazda, and Asahi Beverages (Woodstock). These organisations understand the game, the team and the history, they want to be part of the trials and tribulations; they're not fair-weather sponsors, having stuck by the team throughout many a challenging season. What benefit do these brands get from their association with the team, and how can the Vodafone Warriors give these brands a home team advantage?


The team partnered with NeuroSpot to bring a scientific lens to the field, using the 2019 Round 24 match against the South Sydney Rabbitohs to understand how fan emotion translated to brand value.


The Solution

A scientific research approach to emotion


When undertaking consumer research, one of the benefits of talking direct to customers is that you get their verbatim thoughts - they tell you what’s consciously entered their minds. The downside is that they tell you exactly what they think they feel, as so much of our mental processing is subconscious. As humans, we are remarkably poor at being able to accurately describe what is going on inside our own heads. 


A scientific approach, like the one taken by NeuroSpot, measures the body's physiological response, instead of relying on consumers identification and recall of emotion. To answer this question for the Vodafone Warriors, NeuroSpot used biometric technology that measured changes in galvanic skin response - essentially, sweat - throughout the game. When your body encounters an emotional response (for instance, the elation of a try, anger of a ref's wrong call, or the disappointment of the other team scoring), your skin responds with subtle changes - so small you might not even notice them yourself.


Kicking off the study


20 fans were recruited and set up with two small sensors on their fingers and watched the game from a media box. The sensors were set up pre-game to enable baseline measures to be recorded, and then throughout the game NeuroSpot monitored and measured second-by-second fluctuations in fan emotion - and identified what caused it.


The Results

If you know a Vodafone Warriors fan, you'll know they're a passionate bunch - and watching their team live at the home stadium only heightens the excitement. This came through in the study, with an overall uplift of 38% in heightened emotion vs the baseline.


Vodafone Warriors player Ken Maumalo scored the second try for the team in this game, in what was the most exciting moment of the match - we observed a 44% uplift in heightened emotion when this occurred in the 37th minute. Only two minutes earlier the first try was scored by Adam Pompey, observing a 20% uplift. Onya, Ken.


The other team scoring? That's exciting.


You'd be hard pressed to find a true Vodafone Warriors fan who would tell you the other team scoring is exciting. But that's just what our study showed; with a 25% jump off the back of a breakaway try to Dane Gagai. Just goes to show, the excitement of a live sporting event doesn't just come from your team scoring - people respond to the excitement of both teams competing and the atmosphere at the event.


But do fans really care about the sponsors?


Let's get back to the crux of the question from our client. Are our fans taking the excitement and emotion of a live sporting match, and transferring that into positive brand associations for the sponsors?


As part of the study, fans were shown a series of sponsor adverts before the game started, and during the half-time break. Would the excitement of the game cause them to respond differently to the adverts?


In short: Yes. Our key finding was that emotional responses to the same adverts increased by 21% at half-time vs before the game. That means, watching the same advert during half-time stimulated a bigger emotional response from the fan.


While this study only looked at specific sponsor adverts before and half-way through the game, the uplift in emotion measured clearly demonstrates that a sponsorship can provide value to a brand, particularly when associated with a live sporting event. This is good news for the Vodafone Warriors and their sponsors, with more opportunity for positive associations by increasing sponsor logo placement both in stadium and on player uniforms.

 


NeuroSpot worked with Aaron Lawton, GM Marketing, Communications and Projects at NZ Warriors. He had this to say about working with us:

“We often hear that following the Vodafone Warriors is like riding the world’s longest rollercoaster ride. Sure, there’s sometimes disappointments, but there’s always plenty of excitement too when it comes to watching our games. That said, we wanted to know whether we could back up something so subjective with some more objective insight. Innovation and doing things differently is a key value here at the club so when the opportunity arose to do something like this, we absolutely jumped at the chance” 


A final note - in the particular game studied, the final result was Warriors 10, South Sydney Rabbitohs 31, which goes to show that no matter how your team play, it's still possible for your brand to reap the benefits from a sponsorship.

By Cole Armstrong September 4, 2024
In recent discussions about customer behaviour, a recurring theme has emerged: the belief that providing more information will lead to better decision-making (“If only they knew … then they would …”). While this perspective isn't entirely misplaced, it overlooks a crucial nuance. It's not merely what people know that drives their behaviour, but rather what information is most salient and readily springs to mind in the moment of decision. The Limitation of Knowledge Alone It's easy to assume that if customers simply knew more, they would make better decisions. For instance, knowing how to budget effectively or save money can indeed be useful. Knowing that I should save more for retirement or for investments. That I should eat less red meat for health or sustainability reasons. That I should be careful about what information I share online. These are all real-life examples of issues I’ve worked on where educating customers (or users) might have been a solution – and where helping people ‘know’ why they should do it failed to shift the needle. The critical factor isn't just having the information, but rather how accessible and prominent that information is when it’s needed. The question then is not do I know something, but rather does it spring to mind when it can actually shape my decisions? The Salience of Information in Decision-Making Consider a scenario where a customer interacts with a product or service. The decision-making process is often instantaneous and intuitive, driven by what immediately comes to mind rather than a comprehensive evaluation of all known benefits. This means that the information most salient at the moment—whether it's the immediate cost or a specific feature—has a more significant impact than the general knowledge a customer might have. As an example, I was involved in a project where my client was responding to new environmental regulations – and wanted to find out how to do this without upsetting their customers. The initial solution didn’t work because what was salient – and thus impacted customers responses – was the benefit to the brand not the benefit to the environment. While both benefits were ‘known’ by customers, it wasn’t till small tweaks were made to subtly emphasise and customer support for such actions, that complaints dropped off. A Case in Point: Council Rates Another example where this idea is relevant are the rates (tax) bills that New Zealanders receive from their local council. While residents might be well aware of the benefits their rates support—such as parks, libraries, and community services—this knowledge doesn’t always translate into a positive reaction when the bill arrives. For many, the first thing that springs to mind is the expense, not the benefits. In my case, receiving a $1,000 council rates bill (these are billed quarterly) was a stark reminder of this phenomenon. Despite understanding the value provided by these rates, the immediate focus was on the financial burden. If the benefits were more salient at the time of billing, the experience could be more positive. For instance, if the rates bill included a summary of the value received from various services—like a breakdown showing the value I obtain from the library based on the number of books borrowed—this could shift the focus from the cost to the benefits. In my case, borrowing 35 books over three months at an estimated value of $30 each amount to $1,050 worth of benefits, which highlights the value received far beyond the cost. And of course there are other services that I use as well – my local park that I go running in, the playgrounds that I take my kids to, the roads I drive along or the public transport that is subsidised. I ‘know’ these things, but do they immediately spring to mind when I see my rates bill? Seizing the Opportunity This concept of salience extends beyond council rates. In various customer interactions—such as bills, invoices, loyalty schemes, and product renewals—the opportunity lies in enhancing the salience of positive attributes at the critical moment of engagement. To effectively leverage this understanding, organisations should focus on making the benefits of their products or services more prominent when customers are most engaged and in a way that is relevant to the context. This means designing communications and touchpoints that highlight the value received, not just the cost or features.  While knowledge is important, it's the salience of that knowledge at the moment of decision that truly influences behaviour. By ensuring that the most relevant and positive information is top-of-mind, organisations can improve customer satisfaction and decision-making outcomes.
By Cole Armstrong July 24, 2024
Navigating the Shifting Landscape of Design
By Cole Armstrong March 15, 2024
How do we create persuasive touchpoints that make a difference? By considering how simple ways of reframing our messages, using insights from psychology and behavioural science, can create greater motivation to act.
Show More
Share by: